<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Idea File</title>
	<atom:link href="http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on political philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Peter Russell on Popular Sovereignty by janetajzenstat</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/peter-russell-on-popular-sovereignty/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>janetajzenstat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/?p=331#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Thanks Chris. You are right. I haven&#039;t paid enough attention to the debates in the legislatures about choosing the delegates to Charlottetown, and Quebec. Readers: please remember to check out Moore&#039;s 1867.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Chris. You are right. I haven&#8217;t paid enough attention to the debates in the legislatures about choosing the delegates to Charlottetown, and Quebec. Readers: please remember to check out Moore&#8217;s 1867.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peter Russell on Popular Sovereignty by Christopher Moore</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/peter-russell-on-popular-sovereignty/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/?p=331#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Janet, one minor quibble. It wasn&#039;t so much &quot;the colonial elites&quot; that met at Quebec in 1864, it was delegates chosen from the colonial legislatures of BNA. Just a bunch of MPs, some not very elite at all, except for being the people&#039;s elected representatives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janet, one minor quibble. It wasn&#8217;t so much &#8220;the colonial elites&#8221; that met at Quebec in 1864, it was delegates chosen from the colonial legislatures of BNA. Just a bunch of MPs, some not very elite at all, except for being the people&#8217;s elected representatives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by janetajzenstat</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/about/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>janetajzenstat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Kalen Hastings: 

I don&#039;t know of anyone who argued that criminal law should be a   provincial matter. The founders had the example of the U.S. where   criminal law is a state matter. But I do not know of anyone who argues   for it in Canada. Good question. This is something that Peter Russell   might be able to tell you more about. (I haven&#039;t read everything!) 

I presume that Cartier argued for health as a provincial matter   because hospitals in Quebec were run by the Church, or by orders of   nuns. It was no doubt seen as as aspect of the Catholic culture of   Quebec. Another good question. 

The Parliament of Canada was to get only matters that affected each   and every person in the federation equally. I guess you could say   that&#039;s why the criminal law fell to the national level. We are all   interested in law and order, the public safety, and I think you could   say that we all have an interest in upholding the idea that the   accused is innocent until proven guilty. 

J.A. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kalen Hastings: </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know of anyone who argued that criminal law should be a   provincial matter. The founders had the example of the U.S. where   criminal law is a state matter. But I do not know of anyone who argues   for it in Canada. Good question. This is something that Peter Russell   might be able to tell you more about. (I haven&#8217;t read everything!) </p>
<p>I presume that Cartier argued for health as a provincial matter   because hospitals in Quebec were run by the Church, or by orders of   nuns. It was no doubt seen as as aspect of the Catholic culture of   Quebec. Another good question. </p>
<p>The Parliament of Canada was to get only matters that affected each   and every person in the federation equally. I guess you could say   that&#8217;s why the criminal law fell to the national level. We are all   interested in law and order, the public safety, and I think you could   say that we all have an interest in upholding the idea that the   accused is innocent until proven guilty. </p>
<p>J.A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Kalen Hastings</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/about/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalen Hastings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-375</guid>
		<description>Hi Dr. Ajzenstat,

Do you know where I can locate some resources that trace the debates surrounding the provisions that were to be included in federal and provincial areas of jurisdiction?  In other words, why did the founders choose to make health care a provincial as opposed to a federal area of jurisdiction?  Were there some founders that argued that criminal law should be a provincial matter?

I&#039;ve read your book on Canada&#039;s Founding Debates and found it very helpful.  I&#039;m just hoping to add some missing pieces to the &quot;founding puzzle.&quot;  

Best wishes,
Kalen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr. Ajzenstat,</p>
<p>Do you know where I can locate some resources that trace the debates surrounding the provisions that were to be included in federal and provincial areas of jurisdiction?  In other words, why did the founders choose to make health care a provincial as opposed to a federal area of jurisdiction?  Were there some founders that argued that criminal law should be a provincial matter?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read your book on Canada&#8217;s Founding Debates and found it very helpful.  I&#8217;m just hoping to add some missing pieces to the &#8220;founding puzzle.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />
Kalen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Publishing Blues by janetajzenstat</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/publishing-blues/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>janetajzenstat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/?p=180#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Hello Maureen. Documents on Canadian Confederation is out. I&#039;m holding   it in my hand. Order from McGill-Queen&#039;s or from Amazon. Amazon is   already offering a discount. Regards, Janet Ajzenstat </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Maureen. Documents on Canadian Confederation is out. I&#8217;m holding   it in my hand. Order from McGill-Queen&#8217;s or from Amazon. Amazon is   already offering a discount. Regards, Janet Ajzenstat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Responsible Government in 1867 by Ajzenstat on the BNA Act &#171; Andrew Smith&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/responsible-government-in-1867/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajzenstat on the BNA Act &#171; Andrew Smith&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/?p=308#comment-370</guid>
		<description>[...] on the BNA&#160;Act  11 10 2009   Janet Ajzenstat has replied to a recent post in which I said that Canada’s constitution was partly written and partly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the BNA&nbsp;Act  11 10 2009   Janet Ajzenstat has replied to a recent post in which I said that Canada’s constitution was partly written and partly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Publishing Blues by Jeremy Fraser</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/publishing-blues/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/?p=180#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Hello Janet,

I recently got a copy of your book &#039;Canada&#039;s Founding Debates&#039;. I think it is is awesome what you are doing to re publish the original confederation debates. I am from Calgary, but I am pursuing a degree in Liberal Arts at Thomas Aquinas College, California along with a number of other fellow Canadians. We recently formed a new organization called the Canadian Expatriate Society here on campus to help our fellow Canadians in the college community keep up to date and involve in Canadian affairs and to promote academic and career opportunities in Canada. 

As part of our liberal arts program we study the American founding documents and debates. This prompted us to come up with an extra-curricular seminar on Canada&#039;s political founding in the process of confederation. Two of the professors here are Canadians by birth and are both interested in leading such a seminar. We have therefore begun research into what to use as material. Your book has been very helpful in our search. After reading your bibliography we thought that the &#039;Documents on the Confederation of British North America&#039; by G.P. Browne would be ideal for a seminar. We are hoping that it will be republished in time to get copies of it soon. Do you know if there is some way I can be notified as soon as it comes out? All the best,

Sincerely,
Jeremy Fraser
President, Canadian Expatriate Society, Thomas Aquinas College, California</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Janet,</p>
<p>I recently got a copy of your book &#8216;Canada&#8217;s Founding Debates&#8217;. I think it is is awesome what you are doing to re publish the original confederation debates. I am from Calgary, but I am pursuing a degree in Liberal Arts at Thomas Aquinas College, California along with a number of other fellow Canadians. We recently formed a new organization called the Canadian Expatriate Society here on campus to help our fellow Canadians in the college community keep up to date and involve in Canadian affairs and to promote academic and career opportunities in Canada. </p>
<p>As part of our liberal arts program we study the American founding documents and debates. This prompted us to come up with an extra-curricular seminar on Canada&#8217;s political founding in the process of confederation. Two of the professors here are Canadians by birth and are both interested in leading such a seminar. We have therefore begun research into what to use as material. Your book has been very helpful in our search. After reading your bibliography we thought that the &#8216;Documents on the Confederation of British North America&#8217; by G.P. Browne would be ideal for a seminar. We are hoping that it will be republished in time to get copies of it soon. Do you know if there is some way I can be notified as soon as it comes out? All the best,</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Jeremy Fraser<br />
President, Canadian Expatriate Society, Thomas Aquinas College, California</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stratford Observations by Stephen MacLean</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/stratford-observations/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen MacLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/?p=313#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Ah, no fears, the East knows all about the doings in Upper Canada!

Condolences to the family and friends of Douglas Campbell, one of Stratford’s greats.  Of course, I knew of Campbell as Inspector Alistair Cameron from CBC’s ‘The Great Detective’ — A fine actor whose dramatic heft allowed audiences to appreciate one facet of early Canadian history.  R.I.P.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, no fears, the East knows all about the doings in Upper Canada!</p>
<p>Condolences to the family and friends of Douglas Campbell, one of Stratford’s greats.  Of course, I knew of Campbell as Inspector Alistair Cameron from CBC’s ‘The Great Detective’ — A fine actor whose dramatic heft allowed audiences to appreciate one facet of early Canadian history.  R.I.P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Responsible Government in 1867 by Stephen MacLean</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/responsible-government-in-1867/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen MacLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/?p=308#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Kudos to Dr Ajzenstat for keeping alive the nomenclature of the &#039;British North America Act&#039; and the ideals it exemplifies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to Dr Ajzenstat for keeping alive the nomenclature of the &#8216;British North America Act&#8217; and the ideals it exemplifies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hey, Jim! Where&#8217;s My Constitution? by Stephen MacLean</title>
		<link>http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/hey-jim-wheres-my-constitution/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen MacLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://janetajzenstat.wordpress.com/?p=303#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Give &#039;em heck, Janet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give &#8216;em heck, Janet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>